Skip to main content

Bleak Times for Trump’s USA? by Bill Lee

“If we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration, there may not be an election in 2028.” Gavin Newsom, Governor of California


The news from the US of A about the wild and weird pronouncements and actions of the abhorrent individual sitting in the most powerful seat in the land, DJ Trump, is bleak. There is his destructive mania for imposing tariffs on every nation in the world: his corrupt attempt to block public knowledge of the truth of the sordid matter of the Epstein files; his racist hatred of Brown and Black people and his inhumane policy of arresting them willy nilly and illegally deporting many; his war on the hard won rights of women and other minorities; his ignoring of court orders (he owns a more or less corrupt Supreme Court); his impossible and unhinged comments on wanting Canada to become the 51st state of the USA; and his increasingly wacky and garbled speech, are only the most recent concerns. But probably the most dangerous of his right-wing campaigns is to destroy any effort to moderate, let alone halt, the march toward the looming climate catastrophe. Just this week it was reported that he was using the opportunity of his trip to England to absurdly criticize that country’s use of windmills.


Under this short but baleful Trump rule, the USA has staggered to the point of now teetering dangerously on the edge of chaos and plunging into the depths of oligarchy and dictatorship. This is at the hands of someone who is a not very intelligent, second rate grafter, along with a bunch of his avaricious and clearly enthralled sycophants. Through his placing these sleazy incompetents in powerful government positions, this immoral and abhorrent individual controls the key governing institutions, the Justice department, the Supreme Court, the Department of Health, the armed forces, Foreign aid, etc., etc.. There are no checks or balances on how presidential power is functioning. There is, one supposes, the hope that the apparently confused Democratic Party will recapture the House of Representatives (but not likely the Senate) at the midterm elections, which are more than a year away. They, one again assumes, expect to mount a third successful impeachment process. However, that would require that Trump and his minions not successfully bully their way to messing up the “normal” voting process so that the Democrats hopes will be dashed. And in any event should the Democrats not gain a sufficient number of Senate seats, they cannot hope to meet anything but a blockage in the Senate.


I have of course been wrong before but I’m much afraid that the long struggle back to some form of normalcy and human decency in the USA will be an exceedingly difficult one, and I fear the possibility of it being a bloody one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

THE TRAGEDY OF HAMLET: THE FATAL ERROR OF INDIVIDUALISM by Bill Lee

  I suspect I am not alone in remembering that I was taught in high school English class that Shakespeare’s great tragedy, Hamlet, was about a man who simply could not make up his mind to take action and get vengeance for the murder of his father. The lesson that Shakespeare was laying down for us, we were told, was that Hamlet dithered, was indecisive, and that his failure to act decisively led to his own downfall and the death of others. But that was, and is, a superficial reading of the play. I had the opportunity while at university in Houston, of studying under, and knowing, a very perceptive English professor and my mentor, who helped his students understand the real tragedy. It is one that has never left me and a teaching that I urge all of us to think about. What we learned in that English class was that the real tragedy of Hamlet was more social and political than personal. It was not simply that he was indecisive but that, more importantly, he refused to acknowledge and u...