Skip to main content

George Engel and A Time for New Directions in Health Care

By: Jim Ward 

In April 1977, George L. Engel, then a professor of Psychiatry and Medicine at the University of Rochester, New York, published an article in Science entitled “The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine.” In that article, Professor Engel argued for a more holistic approach to medicine in the western world. Engel believed that medicine had become more and more narrowly focused in its approach: that practitioners were almost entirely focused on a biomedical approach to human health concerns to the virtual exclusion of psychosociological concerns. Patients were increasingly being seen as biological machines, separate from their psychological and social experiences and environments. This tendency, Engel claimed, was even more apparent within the relatively new “medical science” of psychiatry. This latter discipline, he argued, had swallowed the biomedical model hook, line and sinker. This was seen to be problematic by Engel because the model was far too deterministic for mainstream medicine and, therefore, ludicrously so in psychiatry which many felt was more appropriately seen as a branch of behavioural science rather than medicine.
I came across this 37 year old article by pure serendipity, whilst searching the internet one day recently for information regarding approaches to mental illness. This was of interest to me because, up until recently, I taught a course called “A History of Madness” at Toronto’s Ryerson University. What really stunned me was how such a truly seminal article, published so long ago has been almost totally ignored.
In the past 37 years both medicine and psychiatry have become increasingly narrow and biomedical in their approach. In the modern world, psychiatrists and physicians know little about their patients’ lives: what they do for a living, the neighbourhoods they live in, their family situations, their financial situations, their hopes and dreams. Each patient is seen as a separate piece of machinery to be tinkered with. There is currently little difference between an automobile going in for its quarterly service and the annual check up of a human being.
This may not be such a problem except for the fact that the solution to physical and mental health problems is seen increasingly as the prescribing of one drug or another. This relates closely to the narrow biomedical approach. The most worrying aspect of this is that this tendency is difficult to halt or slow down because of the special interests that would lose out substantially were a more holistic approach to physical and mental health be taken.
A New York Times article recently featured a psychiatrist bemoaning the replacement of talk therapy with drug therapy over the past 30 years. He admitted that he made much more money by prescribing drugs rather than talking to patients because it meant he could see three times as many patients in the same time. Many critics in recent years have pointed out the huge profits 
being made in the pharmaceutical industry. One of the areas in which labour costs have increased enormously in recent years has been in medicine, both physical and psychiatric. New high tech gadgets such as cat scanners and brain imaging machines are enormously costly. Such gadgets increase the emphasis on a biomedical approach to physical and mental health issues.
Granted, it is virtually impossible to measure the effectiveness of dollars spent in health care. There are so many variables that can affect the health of an individual and a population, the health care itself is just one of many. Here in Ontario, the Ministry of Health attempted to avoid this complexity by simply measuring wait times to get health care. The reason such variables are singled out for measurement is that they are easily measurable. Whether or not decreased wait times has a positive impact on health is impossible to measure. One study that brings this point home vividly is The Spirit Level. This comparative study of health outcomes and costs in OECD countries notes that the United States has the highest health costs and the poorest levels of health, measured by morbidity and mortality rates.
Now, 37 years after it was written, it is time to revisit George Engel’s 1977 article and to ask some serious questions about whither health care, both physical and mental.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bleak Times for Trump’s USA? by Bill Lee

“If we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration, there  may not be an election in 2028.” Gavin Newsom, Governor of California The news from the US of A about the wild and weird pronouncements and actions of the abhorrent individual sitting in the most powerful seat in the land, DJ Trump, is bleak. There is his destructive mania for imposing tariffs on every nation in the world: his corrupt attempt to block public knowledge of the truth of the sordid matter of the Epstein files; his racist hatred of Brown and Black people and his inhumane policy of arresting them willy nilly and illegally deporting many; his war on the hard won rights of women and other minorities; his ignoring of court orders (he owns a more or less corrupt Supreme Court); his impossible and unhinged comments on wanting Canada to become the 51st state of the USA; and his increasingly wacky and garbled speech, are only the most recent concerns. But probably the most dangerous of his right-wing campaig...
Post a Comment
Read more

Party Status for the NDP? by Wayne Johnson

Permit me to pontificate on the issue of a minority government. It can be good, when MPs act in the best interests of the nation. The Cons have come right out of the gate claiming that they will derail any of PM Carneys plans. Folks I’m sorry, political preferences aside, our nation is facing some very serious challenges ahead. We are in point of fact at War, with the USA, an economic war. This economic war could very well escalate based on the threats of military annexation. And the Cons seem to want to derail government during a national and international crisis, not just economically but geopolitically, with the War in Ukraine and Trump’s lust for Panama and Greenland, for example. We also know who puts party above country… The Conservative party of Canada hands down… If I were advising Mr. Carney I would suggest that it is very much in the nation’s best interests to grant the NDP official party status. This is very much doable and has been granted in the past. The NDP has a long a...
Post a Comment
Read more