Skip to main content

Gun Violence and Bigotry, Due South & in Canada



Bill Lee
August 24, 2019

Trump in his Florida speech asked how “these people” could be “stopped”. Someone among the crowd shouted, “Shoot them!” At first laughing, Trump responded, "That's only in the [Florida] panhandle, can you get away with that statement.[1]

Given the obscene number of deaths from mass shootings in the USA recently it is probably not surprising that some of the old "rationales" have been taken off the shelf and dusted off. One GOP “legislator” has opined that there is a link to the spread and consumption of violent video games. Leaving aside that this is an exceedingly tired trope that has never been proven, there are a couple of others that clearly have much greater power as explanations. It is not, for example a fanciful notion that high capacity automatic weapons are a more likely link.[2] But there is another issue that really deserves much more full attention. When, oh when will the denizens political class, the media, and “polite” society in general, cease being so “civilized” and deferential with the demagogic Trump and his hate filled, loathsome, bigoted attacks on marginalized people of colour and immigrants? For example, in May of this year at one of his self-promotion rallies in Florida Trump said that the USA was being "invaded by immigrants". 

The El Paso mass murderer, in his manifesto said that he wanted to stop "the invasion". The fact is that there is a demonstrably clear line between what the malign bloviator says and what some of his true believing followers do. The media so often seems to feel the need to offer some sort of proviso that, “of course Trump can’t be blamed for the awful act that some “evil”, “bad”, or “mentally unhinged”, etc. person has undertaken. But that is not true. It is important to understand that a very powerful and charismatic demagogue[3] doesn’t have to actually tell people to go and shoot marginalized people. Ian Kershaw has explained how there is no direct evidence that Hitler ever directly ordered anyone to begin the great atrocity of the holocaust. He didn’t have to, there was an ethic and understanding that had been cultivated among the true believing Nazis; it was called, “Working toward the Fuhrer” which meant that they should constantly be taking their own actions to further what they knew Hitler wanted done. They watched and listened for his subtle and not so subtle hints. This is very reminiscent of what is happening in these acts of white nationalists murdering Latino people, Jews, Afro Americans and Muslims. He speaks, they act.


Before I leave this little reflection and I would like to ponder something about our own country. I am hardly alone in this concern, but we should not assume because we are not the USA we are somehow home free on the issue of bigotry and violence. We have our own xenophobic and racist issues to deal with. For example, we have the on-line Rebel Media with Ezra Levant braying incredibly appalling racist and xenophobic agitprop. Recently we have seen the government of Quebec enact a law that discriminates against wearing of religious garb that clearly has as its real intent discrimination against Muslim women. We know that the Conservative Party of Canada harboured the vile colonial racist Senator, Lynne Bayek for years while she was spewing her vile codswallop against Indigenous people, all on the dime of the Canadian public purse. Andrew Scheer has received an A grade from Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights(CCRR)  for promising to repeal many of the gun ownership, usage, and transportation laws currently in effect in Canada (https://firearmrights.ca/en/ccfr-report-cards-cpc-leadership-election/). Further, Canada's conservatives have a history (the Harper government, for example, cancelled the registration program of all firearms) of wanting to open the door to more firearms and less regulation. And finally, the on-line magazine Vice has reported that Conservative Party's  Senator Pierre-Huguex has confirmed that he is a member of the group, 

The Canadian Coalition of Concerned Citizens, which is a right wing organization that likes to demonize Muslim people and seems to support Maxime Bernier’s so-called Peoples Party. We also, in the last couple of years have been witness to the way the legal system treated the killing (some would say the cold blooded killing) of Colton Boushie, a young Cree man, by an Alberta farmer. But it was not only the dismaying knowledge that the court system failed the Boushie family, but the manner in which the local media managed to go along with the colonial narrative that somehow Boushie was at fault for his own violent death. More recently we have heard the howls of protest that the Report of MMIW&G would have the audacity to link the murders and disappearances, and the lack of interest by police, with the history of genocide of Indigenous people in Canada. Clearly the potential for repression of marginalized people is alive and well here. 


There are two differences worth noting in this country, however. The first is that the culture of gun violence here, as in most countries of the Global North, is simply far less perverted. We have avoided the insanity of the American second amendment delusion. The USA is far ahead, or behind, Canada in the belief that having an automatic military grade weapon is necessary for individual protection. The second difference is that we have no public person with the charisma and popularity with a significant base who has espoused the kind of xenophobic or racist sentiments as Trump has. Not one of the people mentioned earlier, or anyone else, have made any significant impression on a large section of the Canadian voting public, yet. Indeed, in the USA, Trump appears, we hope, to be an anomaly. While he has many enablers in a GOP who have surrendered any moral sense to him for fear of his turning the wrath of his antediluvian base on them during a primary, there does not seem to be any other politician who has the same kind of malign currency with so many frustrated, fearful and paranoid whitestream people, particularly males. But let us not be too sanguine, no one really saw the Trump train coming. We owe it to ourselves to be vigilant and ready to take on the would be demagogues here.

 It has been heartening that the blowhard Doug Ford has seen his polling number drop drastically as his stupidity, mean spiritedness and nepotism have been unmasked. This should give us some hope but no reason for complacency.


[1] https://abcnews.go.com/US/trumps-language-mexican-immigrants-scrutiny-wake-el-paso/story?id=64768566.

[2] It should be noted that Trump quietly signed a bill into law in early 2017 that rolled back an Obama-era regulation that made it harder for people with mental illnesses to purchase a gun.
[3] The dictionary definitions of a demagogue suggests person who builds support by ​appealing to prejudicial, bigoted and simplistic ​ideas

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

THE PROFOUND EMPTINESS OF PIERE POILIEVRE by Bill lee

“You take the lies out of him, and he’ll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he’ll disappear.” - Mark Twain. There has never been any very substantial evidence that Pierre Poilievre is an even moderately well-rounded human being, or someone with even a modicum of depth. What he clearly is, is a career politician with no experience of, and no apparent interest in, life outside of the narrow, dark recesses of the CPC caucus room; i.e., he’s a pure political operator. Though that is something, let’s be honest, it is not a whole lot, at least if one wants to become an authentic political leader. At this point however he is becoming (has become?) a completely plastic image created by the gang of back-room boys whose task it is to construct something that looks like a leader. Whether what they have rendered in PP is, or even looks like, a leader however is questionable. Good leaders (never mind great ones) have an ability to, and interest in, showing an unders...