Skip to main content

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee


Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the idea, the numbers are vague (I think deliberately so) at best. So we're not sure how much the tax roll back would be, and second, whatever it is, it can't cover all the issues, poverty reduction among them that the province faces. And Horvath went absolutely balistic at the thought of road tolls and a gas tax hike that was discussed for transit expansion. Indeed, taxes have become a dirty word in the party of Tommy Douglas and David Lewis and, "No tax hikes" has become the mantra. The fact is, the middle class in Canada in general and Ontario in particular are not over taxed at this point. I do agree with the point sometimes made that in Ontario right now, there is little appetite for a socialist alternative. On the other hand, the NDP is not even close to making a case for such an alternative (nor unfortunately is the union movement but at least they support anti-poverty groups like "Put Food in the Budget"). They've moved to the centre. An NDP friend of mine who may very well be running in the recently called election - avers that she would like to see a government (one of an NDP persuasion) like Norway, Sweden and Finland. It would be good to have a government like these three countries here in Ontario, but we need to remember that the tax rates there reflect the services their citizens receive. They don't repeat the cant of the anti-tax zealots. In Ontario (and Canada overall) the NDP refuse to make the case that all of us, not only the rich (and yep, lets make them pay their fair share) need to pay a level of tax that reflects the needs of our population.
The NDP have fallen victim of that old malady, fixation on electoral success. This is always challenging for a party with a tradition of fighting for progressive causes. But it makes for particular difficulties within the neoliberal context developed over the last forty years. Thus Andrea Horvath mouths the same blather as the likes of Tim Hudak, Rob Ford and Stephen Harper. This, I very much fear, is leading to a death of a genuine left electoral politic, one that offers a real progressive program and replaces it with accusations of the other guy's malfeasance and vague promises to tax the large (how large?) corporations and to be competent managers of the economy. This doesn't add up to much more than what the Libers and the Cons usually proffer. A columnist in my morning paper suggested that Andrea Horvath and her brain trust do not at all expect to win an election, their claims to the contrary, but are hoping to replace the Libers and become Official Opposition. To the extent that this is an accurate reading (and I think it is pretty much on the money) it doesn't get much more cynical than this. The lust after the "glory" of being the opposition and damned be the province (or the country for that matter). This is the strategy Jack Layton put into practice at the Federal level and we have eight years of the most viscious right wing government in Canadian history. So, while it is entirely possible that the Liberals will again form a minority government with who knows what place the NDP comes, it is also possible that the vile Harris look alike, Tim Hudak and his union hating gang of thugs could win outright or sufficient to from a minority. Then what would Andrea and her buddies do? What would we the people of the province do? This is all rather sobering, and I wish I could be more optimistic. But the fact is, we, the Left, cannot play their game their way and expect to have a Left politic.


Comments

  1. For the record, Horwath did not force this election. Wynne did by NOT negotiating with an opposition party to win their support for the budget.
    In stead of repeating corporate media spin, the budget was a mixture of both corporate giveaways and promises the Liberals would never have kept.
    Here is a very insightful media analysis with a genuine left perspective: http://www.troymedia.com/2014/05/04/it-is-andrea-horwaths-election-to-lose/
    "Her loss of confidence in the Liberal government and her party’s decision to vote against the budget is reminiscent of the populism of the progressive farmer’s movement in Ontario in the 1920s. “I am quite willing,” she said as her press conference ended, “to put this in the hands of the people, and I will support their decision.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lawloro Wm. Lee8 May 2014 at 18:51

      Jan, I'm on your side but let us not guild the Lilly. Andrea announced that she was not going to support the budget.

      Delete
  2. "The New Democrats haven't said what they'd do with the plant. But both Hudak and McGuinty need to be clear about how much their promises will cost, said leader Andrea Horwath.

    "Last-minute promises like that, people have to decide whether they're credible or they're not," she said in Niagara Falls. "Now Mr. Hudak's making the same claim, we don't know what that's going to cost. I think what both these guys need to do is be really upfront with the public about what the cost of cancelling these deals is going to be."
    Hudak vows to scrap Mississauga power plant ~ http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hudak-vows-to-scrap-mississauga-power-plant-1.991357
    Is this one of those Manufactured Consent moments when one hears it repeated so many times, it must be true.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lawlor Wm. Lee8 May 2014 at 19:00

    The issue for me Jan is that the NDP under Andrea Horvath has not articulated a coherent Left progressive agenda. For example a $12.00 minimum wage is just marginally better than the Libers and there is nothing about assisting those in poverty. The NDP leadership is counting on us progressives to support an agenda that is not Left, just not as Right as the other guy because they are the worst of a bad lot.You are better then that,

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

THE PROFOUND EMPTINESS OF PIERE POILIEVRE by Bill lee

“You take the lies out of him, and he’ll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he’ll disappear.” - Mark Twain. There has never been any very substantial evidence that Pierre Poilievre is an even moderately well-rounded human being, or someone with even a modicum of depth. What he clearly is, is a career politician with no experience of, and no apparent interest in, life outside of the narrow, dark recesses of the CPC caucus room; i.e., he’s a pure political operator. Though that is something, let’s be honest, it is not a whole lot, at least if one wants to become an authentic political leader. At this point however he is becoming (has become?) a completely plastic image created by the gang of back-room boys whose task it is to construct something that looks like a leader. Whether what they have rendered in PP is, or even looks like, a leader however is questionable. Good leaders (never mind great ones) have an ability to, and interest in, showing an unders...

Gun Violence and Bigotry, Due South & in Canada

Bill Lee August 24, 2019 Trump in his Florida speech asked how “these people” could be “stopped”. Someone among the crowd shouted, “Shoot them!” At first laughing, Trump responded, "That's only in the [Florida] panhandle, can you get away with that statement. [1] Given the obscene number of deaths from mass shootings in the USA recently it is probably not surprising that some of the old "rationales" have been taken off the shelf and dusted off. One GOP “legislator” has opined that there is a link to the spread and consumption of violent video games. Leaving aside that this is an exceedingly tired trope that has never been proven, there are a couple of others that clearly have much greater power as explanations. It is not, for example a fanciful notion that high capacity automatic weapons are a more likely link. [2] But there is another issue that really deserves much more full attention. When, oh when will the denizens political class, the media, a...