Skip to main content

THE WORLD CUP AT OUR THROATS, AGAIN

By: Bill Lee


Well, we will shortly have the Great Insane Boondoggle (aka the FIFA World Cup) upon us and at our throats. For one month and more the media will have non stop "coverage" and we will be inundated by over the top blather about the so called "Beautiful Game". I bet the publicity corporation that came up with that one made a bundle. The CBC I understand has won the booby prize of being the Canadian mouthpiece for the various games and its faithful listeners will be fed the usual codswallop that attends all the over -hyped zaniness. Beautiful game eh? It is not just that the game is slow and that players dive like Kingfishers at every opportunity that I object to. Indeed, I actually enjoyed watching my grandchildren play, it was good exercise too. But, the fact of the matter is, like many pro sports (but more so, much more so) soccer, and particularly the World Cup variety has millionaire players who play for teams owned by billionaires in front of people whose elites have been hoodwinked into putting the damn circus on. These are countries who have been extorted by FIFA, surely one of the most sleazy international sports organization on the planet (I realize that professionals cricket in India is supposed to be riddled with gambling problems and I know, the IOC is right up there in terms of its crooked process for awarding the games but I think it is safe to say that FIFA noses it out because the craziness of the games lasts for four weeks and thus the financial stakes are higher). FIFA's process of awarding the cup has been ever noted as a scam and a scandal wherein various members of the club pocket big bucks (under the table money of course). In return some poor country "wins" the opportunity to spend itself into penury for the pleasure of inconveniencing its citizens, not only for the time the games are on but for years prior, as all manner of grotesquely over-large stadiums are built along with the infrastructure to get the deluded fans to the venues. Of course the discomfort usually falls on the less well off people, particularly those at the very bottom of the social/economic ladder. Four years ago South Africa, drew the short straw and we are now hearing of how the huge new and unnecessary venues are hemorrhaging money at a huge rate. South Africa is clearly not a country that should have thought of, let alone been asked to put on this kind of crazy extravagance. This year we have the spectacle of Brazil, a huge country only recently pulling itself out of the economic doldrums putting its shoulder to the wheel. By all accounts its shoulders weren't sufficiently strong and many of the venues are not quite complete as opening day bears down. One hears that they will not even have been able to test out evacuation procedures necessary if something goes wrong at any of the stadiums. This is supposed to be a requirement, and it is obvious why it should be, but we can imagine that it will be given a pass by the mucky mucks at FIFA. There's money to be garnered after all. Speaking of money, lots was made by building new fluff in areas where heretofore poor people were living and there are many stories of brutal dispossession. One good piece of news I thought is that the public transportation union has refused to drink the Kool-Aid and has mounted a strike to achieve some badly needed raises. The next time the World Cup will be on offer it will be in a country that has plenty of cash, Qatar. By all accounts the bribes were flowing thick and fast in the process of awarding this pinnacle of athletic competition even more venial than ever before, and truly, that is saying something. Of course we are also hearing of the scandal of foreign workers as being pretty much treated as indentured servants or worse and that the working conditions are beyond dangers with a concomitant death rate. It will be interesting I suppose for the legions of fans who will be glued to their TV sets four years hence to watch as the millionaire players staggering around in the 50C heat. Some of that diving may be quite legitimate in the oven like stadiums. But me, I think I'll be taking a pass

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...
4 comments
Read more

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...
1 comment
Read more

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...
1 comment
Read more