Skip to main content

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COLLECTIVE IN HUMAN HISTORY



Jim Ward


One of the greatest challenges facing humankind in the world today is to recognize the importance of the collective. By the collective I mean any situation in which people join together with some kind of notion that this is for the good of all the members of that collective. The 19th century pioneer of sociology and anthropology, Emile Durkheim stressed the notion that to be human one has to belong to some group that is more than him/herself. For Durkheim someone with the human form raised by wolves in a cave would not be human. To be human is to be social. In essence this notion feeds into the left side of modern politics, where the right tends to believe it is all up to oneself and the left believes we are all in this together.

When Hegel praised the German state for being the greatest achievement up to that point in human history, he had in mind a huge collective of several million people that eventually became, with some notorious ups and downs, the modern German nation-state. In fact, the modern nation-state is the largest-scale collective ever known to humankind.

In essence we could see the collective as progressing through several stages, each next stage being at a larger level. Thus, we could say that the initial bonding together of two individuals is the smallest and earliest kind of collective, progressing up through blood-line collectives such as the family and extended family, then the tribe (or lodge?), then the geographic community (small at first) and, eventually, the nation-state. Some recent writings on poverty in the third world have even contemplated a collective that incorporates all of humanity. Was the United Nations an attempt at this? Probably not. Still, it would have seemed just as unlikely to 18th century philosophers that collectives at the nation-state level would ever come into being.

So, in the history of human development the successful collective has become larger and larger, eventually manifesting itself in the creation of about 200 nation-states. However, many of these nation-states are certainly not true collectives, if by a collective we mean a group of people, no matter how large or small, who are equally disposed to goodwill to all within the collective. Perhaps the ones that come closest are the modern northern European state such as Denmark, Norway and Sweden, where the development of a comprehensive welfare state is a concrete indication that a large majority of people in each of those nation-states really cares about the welfare of ones fellow citizens, be it the need for a decent income, decent housing, decent childcare, good education etc. At the other end of the spectrum we have so-called nation-states, where the collective does not extend beyond blood or tribal links. So-called nation-states such as Uganda, Kenya and Russia fit into this category, where all the good life chances go to members of that small collective of ruling elite. The current concern with the high level of corruption in China seems to point in the same direction. In the cases of Russia and China, this is particularly ironic since they went through a period of Communism, a creed that, theoretically, believes in a collectivity of the largest and most inclusive kind.

Of course all modern nation states came through periods of limited collectivity before becoming more all-inclusive and, it seems that the current discussion about growing material inequality in much of the post-industrial world is really a discussion about the breakdown in a broad sense of collectivities in all those territories.

An ongoing threat to the formation of any collective at the nation-state level is the tendency of the members to be split along “them and us”, lines where negative stereotypes seem to be easily bought into, be they about class, religious beliefs, ethnicity or immigrant/citizen status. My suspicion is the winding down of the welfare state has something to do with this.

So the question becomes, how do broad collectivities develop and, once developed, how are they maintained? I will attempt to deal with these questions in upcoming postings.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bleak Times for Trump’s USA? by Bill Lee

“If we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration, there  may not be an election in 2028.” Gavin Newsom, Governor of California The news from the US of A about the wild and weird pronouncements and actions of the abhorrent individual sitting in the most powerful seat in the land, DJ Trump, is bleak. There is his destructive mania for imposing tariffs on every nation in the world: his corrupt attempt to block public knowledge of the truth of the sordid matter of the Epstein files; his racist hatred of Brown and Black people and his inhumane policy of arresting them willy nilly and illegally deporting many; his war on the hard won rights of women and other minorities; his ignoring of court orders (he owns a more or less corrupt Supreme Court); his impossible and unhinged comments on wanting Canada to become the 51st state of the USA; and his increasingly wacky and garbled speech, are only the most recent concerns. But probably the most dangerous of his right-wing campaig...
Post a Comment
Read more

Party Status for the NDP? by Wayne Johnson

Permit me to pontificate on the issue of a minority government. It can be good, when MPs act in the best interests of the nation. The Cons have come right out of the gate claiming that they will derail any of PM Carneys plans. Folks I’m sorry, political preferences aside, our nation is facing some very serious challenges ahead. We are in point of fact at War, with the USA, an economic war. This economic war could very well escalate based on the threats of military annexation. And the Cons seem to want to derail government during a national and international crisis, not just economically but geopolitically, with the War in Ukraine and Trump’s lust for Panama and Greenland, for example. We also know who puts party above country… The Conservative party of Canada hands down… If I were advising Mr. Carney I would suggest that it is very much in the nation’s best interests to grant the NDP official party status. This is very much doable and has been granted in the past. The NDP has a long a...
Post a Comment
Read more