Skip to main content

THE ONTARIO NDP HAS LEARNED? MAYBE.


By: BILL LEE

There may be hope indeed that the Ontario NDP has learned from the last election performance. In a piece in the Toronto Star, (http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/09/12/andrea_horwath_what_the_ndp_learned_from_the_recent_ontario_campaign.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter) the leader of the now third party in Ontario, Andrea Howrath writes: "It has been a long summer of reflection for me and for our party." and "There are important lessons to learn from our recent campaign." and again, "...our core values of compassion and justice remain the bedrock of our party and remain my heart and soul." All good and appropriately humble from the leader who took the NDP from Official Opposition to third party status. One point in her piece bothered me however, early on she states: "Some of our most committed activists couldn’t hear the values of the party that we love expressed clearly enough." Doesn't this appear just a bit on the evasive side? Frankly, it comes across more like a subtle suggestion that those of who were concerned about her retreat to right wing populism just didn't understand how clever it all had been rather then seeing a capitulations to a mushy middle. Remember those $100.00 checks she was going to send out - more reminiscent of Mike Harris and Stephen Harper then Tommy Douglas, and all the "Gas Plant" blather which echoed the Conservative goof ball, Hudak? The issue for Andrea however was that some old Lefties just couldn't understand what campaign she and her inner circle cooked up was really about. I saw a good deal of that kind of talk in true believing NDP circles during the election and, unfortunately, continue to see it now. It was and is all pure humbug. Lots of folks, including the NDP member who knocked on our door, were dismayed and felt shut out from the inner circle. Nevertheless, the kind of approach she now voices in the article gives one some hope for optimism. In the article she avers that, "We believe in investing in our cities, and in public transit. We believe in protecting our environment. And we believe these things are practical goals that can be achieved." Maybe a bit on the vague side but these are early days for an NDP rethink and they will, hopefully, get more concrete. So while I personally remain agnostic about Horwath, it may be that Left progressive values will attain a pride of place in the party and we'll hear fewer messages from the faithful about "old fogies" not understanding the wisdom of the "New NDP".      In any event, my particular attention and energy is drawn at the moment to Toronto and to the good messages (and now that Rob Ford has withdrawn form the Mayor's race even better, more clear and progressive ones) we hear from Olivia Chow (particularly about transit which is a serious issue for working class people and one that was virtually ignored by the Horwathians during the election). As well, I am happy to see the increasingly progressive policy announcements from Tom Mulcair on the Federal level. Neither of these campaigns are terrifically progressive of course but in both cases they clearly separate themselves from the right wing "tax savings are the only issue" politicos of the right and centre. Indeed, if either or both of these campaigns are in any way successful (and admittedly that is not by any means a given) the Ontario NDP may take real notice and begin to reclaim some notion of a genuine progressive agenda.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...
4 comments
Read more

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...
1 comment
Read more

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...
1 comment
Read more