Skip to main content

THE FEAR OF PARTICULARITY ON THE LEFT


John Clarke
July 24, 2018


Some time ago, an especially dogmatic and thus ultimately unendurable Facebook friend, made a testy response to something I put up on the refugee crisis. This person denounced me for even speaking of a 'refugee crisis'. The person believed that it was because it was, they asserted, really a crisis of capitalism. That struck me as rather like condemning someone for saying they were eating an orange on the grounds that what they were actually eating was fruit.

What I unfortunately see all the time among dogmatic and narrow thinkers on the left, is a stubborn refusal to consider engaging in discussion of incredibly important particular issues and developments out of a fear that this might contaminate previously established general concepts. By doing this, however, those fundamentally correct concepts are reduced to mere lifeless abstractions. Thus, rather than test previously established conclusions against a developing reality, that reality must be made to conform to a previously determined letter of the law. The lengths that some will go to in this regard are quite remarkable.

I recently put up another post on Facebook, something about impoverished disabled people in Bolivia demanding a bare pension and facing police brutality in the process. Someone, not the same person as above, replied that these people were dupes of the American State Department and even questioned if they were really disabled. You encounter a blanket view, in fact, that popular struggles in oppressed countries can only serve imperialism.

Social democracy is not a revolutionary force and socialism will not come from a vote in some Parliament, but to suggest that Jeremy Corbyn is no different to Tony Blair and the rejuvenation of the Labour Party is only a distraction is absurd. Without relating to and intervening in such developments, we are reduced to forming a small band of like minded people and preparing for the Revolution in the way you wait of the number nine bus to show up.

Liberals constantly present Trump as an inexplicable evil who came out of nowhere. He emerged from what came before, of course, but to suggest that the present ascendency of the most ruthless and reckless elements in the USA ruling class is of no consequence is disorientated. At times I've even been challenged when I have suggested that the Israeli leadership is discarding pretensions of liberal democracy and a 'peace process' and working to complete the colonial project, on the grounds that I am sowing illusions in liberal Zionism.

The general concepts about capitalism and its global order that we have developed are of enormous importance but they have validity only to the extent that they are applied. They ossify if they are misused as a way of blocking consideration of particularity and a
meaningful intervention in the complex and rapidly developing reality of the capitalist crisis and class struggle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...

"Marketing climate change" - interview with Terry O Riley

By: Dan Mossip-Balkwill Dan : Let’s start with emotions vs facts.  Why are emotions more powerful than facts in terms of motivation.   Terry: I don’t think facts are a good way to motivate people.  I think facts are seductive to the person with the facts.  A fact seems powerful on its own, it has a revelation or epiphany attached to it, the problem with facts is that they are not emotionally rooted.  In order to move people at all, you need to connect with them emotionally, and most facts don’t do that.  A fact sits there coldly on a piece of paper, and has no emotion attached. One example we’re always told is to chance our batteries in our fire detectors when the clock changes (daylight savings time).  It’s a wonderful fact, but nobody does it.  Getting people to change their behaviour is the toughest thing you can do.  It’s one thing to create desire for a product, but a totally different thing to change ...

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...