Skip to main content

The international dimensions of the fight for water in El Salvador1


                                            Pedro Cabezas2

                                              July 5, 2018

The fight for the defence of water in El Salvador and the recent conflicts that have arisen between legislators and the movement for the defence of water are nothing new in this country.
Since 2006, environmental organizations in El Salvador have demanded the approval of the General Water Law, a bill that recognizes water as a human right and a common good that must be managed publicly with a focus on sustainability, priority and affordability for domestic use, as well as regulation of commercial and industrial use. 
 
The debate on these issues has not always been peaceful, at least in terms of the response of the authorities. In 2007, 17 leaders of the social movement, Association for the Development of El Salvador (CRIPDES) were arrested and accused of terrorism for protesting against a national policy for the decentralization of water the services. This policy was in support of and represented an escalation of an aggressive neoliberal economic strategy based on the privatization of public services and natural commons, through free trade agreements designed to facilitate the privatization of the national patrimony such as telecommunications, the banking system, pensions and sugar mills, among others. 

During the week of June 25, 2017 we were visited by Manuel Perez Rocha from the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington D.C. and Jennifer Moore from MiningWatch Canada, both active members of the International Allies against Mining in El Salvador This is an international grouping of organizations that have accompanied the people of El Salvador through its long battle to have mining prohibited by denouncing and shaming companies that tried to extort obscene amounts of money from the Salvadorian public purse for refusing mining permits. 

In a public forum organized on June 28th, they reminded us that the current international investment regime has no concerns for the negative impacts that companies have on the application on basic human rights; on the contrary, the international economic system is designed to shield corporations from the responsibility of systemically violating the rights 

to life, health, environment, safety, work, environmental degradation, and their responsibility for displacement, forced eviction and the deterioration of the social fabric of communities.
El Salvador, as is other countries in the region, is signatory of over 25 bilateral and multilateral Free Trade and Investment Agreements such as CAFTA, the Alliance for Prosperity, the EU Association Agreement and others that contain mechanisms that commit our government to guarantee the rights of corporations over human well being and human rights. The multi million dollar law suits and similar threats faced by the Salvadoran state and people at the international Centre for the Settlement if Investment Disputes by Pacific Rim/OceanaGold, (Canadian and Australian resource extraction companies) Commerce Group and CEL Enel and Monsanto, all foreign companies linked to local capital, highlight the impunity that characterizes the actions of corporations that operate under the shadows of multilateral institutions. 

Milagro Guevara, Adjunct Ombudswoman for the Environment from the Office for Defence of Human Rights, PDDH, also spoke about the responsibility our legislators have develop the vision of a country that works for the protection of human dignity, ensuring that the activities of companies contribute to improving the quality of life of people through viable practices for the protection and conservation of the environment, where the regulation and prioritization of the use of water resources takes on special relevance as an exclusive responsibility of the State.
In the struggle for the defence of the human right to water, leaders of the Salvadoran social movement are clear that their fight is for public control of natural resources. But they must be aware of the international dimension of the fight for water and bring their demands not only before national authorities, also before the international opinion to denounce multilateral institutions and governments that promote treaties that seek global dominance and control of natural resources by multinational corporations.

____________________________________________________________

1 This article was originally published on the web site: http://www.stopesmining.org/news/83-recent-news/546-the-international-dimensions-of-the-fight-for-water-in-el-salvador on Monday, 02 July 2018. It has been slightly edited. 
2 Pedro Cabezas is a Canadian Resident and an El Salvadorian national who lives in El Salvador. He has worked in social movement organizing for several years.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...
4 comments
Read more

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...
1 comment
Read more

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...
1 comment
Read more