Skip to main content

The international dimensions of the fight for water in El Salvador1


                                            Pedro Cabezas2

                                              July 5, 2018

The fight for the defence of water in El Salvador and the recent conflicts that have arisen between legislators and the movement for the defence of water are nothing new in this country.
Since 2006, environmental organizations in El Salvador have demanded the approval of the General Water Law, a bill that recognizes water as a human right and a common good that must be managed publicly with a focus on sustainability, priority and affordability for domestic use, as well as regulation of commercial and industrial use. 
 
The debate on these issues has not always been peaceful, at least in terms of the response of the authorities. In 2007, 17 leaders of the social movement, Association for the Development of El Salvador (CRIPDES) were arrested and accused of terrorism for protesting against a national policy for the decentralization of water the services. This policy was in support of and represented an escalation of an aggressive neoliberal economic strategy based on the privatization of public services and natural commons, through free trade agreements designed to facilitate the privatization of the national patrimony such as telecommunications, the banking system, pensions and sugar mills, among others. 

During the week of June 25, 2017 we were visited by Manuel Perez Rocha from the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington D.C. and Jennifer Moore from MiningWatch Canada, both active members of the International Allies against Mining in El Salvador This is an international grouping of organizations that have accompanied the people of El Salvador through its long battle to have mining prohibited by denouncing and shaming companies that tried to extort obscene amounts of money from the Salvadorian public purse for refusing mining permits. 


In a public forum organized on June 28th, they reminded us that the current international investment regime has no concerns for the negative impacts that companies have on the application on basic human rights; on the contrary, the international economic system is designed to shield corporations from the responsibility of systemically violating the rights 


to life, health, environment, safety, work, environmental degradation, and their responsibility for displacement, forced eviction and the deterioration of the social fabric of communities.
El Salvador, as is other countries in the region, is signatory of over 25 bilateral and multilateral Free Trade and Investment Agreements such as CAFTA, the Alliance for Prosperity, the EU Association Agreement and others that contain mechanisms that commit our government to guarantee the rights of corporations over human well being and human rights. The multi million dollar law suits and similar threats faced by the Salvadoran state and people at the international Centre for the Settlement if Investment Disputes by Pacific Rim/OceanaGold, (Canadian and Australian resource extraction companies) Commerce Group and CEL Enel and Monsanto, all foreign companies linked to local capital, highlight the impunity that characterizes the actions of corporations that operate under the shadows of multilateral institutions. 


Milagro Guevara, Adjunct Ombudswoman for the Environment from the Office for Defence of Human Rights, PDDH, also spoke about the responsibility our legislators have develop the vision of a country that works for the protection of human dignity, ensuring that the activities of companies contribute to improving the quality of life of people through viable practices for the protection and conservation of the environment, where the regulation and prioritization of the use of water resources takes on special relevance as an exclusive responsibility of the State.
In the struggle for the defence of the human right to water, leaders of the Salvadoran social movement are clear that their fight is for public control of natural resources. But they must be aware of the international dimension of the fight for water and bring their demands not only before national authorities, also before the international opinion to denounce multilateral institutions and governments that promote treaties that seek global dominance and control of natural resources by multinational corporations.

____________________________________________________________

1 This article was originally published on the web site: http://www.stopesmining.org/news/83-recent-news/546-the-international-dimensions-of-the-fight-for-water-in-el-salvador on Monday, 02 July 2018. It has been slightly edited. 
2 Pedro Cabezas is a Canadian Resident and an El Salvadorian national who lives in El Salvador. He has worked in social movement organizing for several years.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

THE TRAGEDY OF HAMLET: THE FATAL ERROR OF INDIVIDUALISM by Bill Lee

  I suspect I am not alone in remembering that I was taught in high school English class that Shakespeare’s great tragedy, Hamlet, was about a man who simply could not make up his mind to take action and get vengeance for the murder of his father. The lesson that Shakespeare was laying down for us, we were told, was that Hamlet dithered, was indecisive, and that his failure to act decisively led to his own downfall and the death of others. But that was, and is, a superficial reading of the play. I had the opportunity while at university in Houston, of studying under, and knowing, a very perceptive English professor and my mentor, who helped his students understand the real tragedy. It is one that has never left me and a teaching that I urge all of us to think about. What we learned in that English class was that the real tragedy of Hamlet was more social and political than personal. It was not simply that he was indecisive but that, more importantly, he refused to acknowledge and u...

Bleak Times for Trump’s USA? by Bill Lee

“If we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration, there  may not be an election in 2028.” Gavin Newsom, Governor of California The news from the US of A about the wild and weird pronouncements and actions of the abhorrent individual sitting in the most powerful seat in the land, DJ Trump, is bleak. There is his destructive mania for imposing tariffs on every nation in the world: his corrupt attempt to block public knowledge of the truth of the sordid matter of the Epstein files; his racist hatred of Brown and Black people and his inhumane policy of arresting them willy nilly and illegally deporting many; his war on the hard won rights of women and other minorities; his ignoring of court orders (he owns a more or less corrupt Supreme Court); his impossible and unhinged comments on wanting Canada to become the 51st state of the USA; and his increasingly wacky and garbled speech, are only the most recent concerns. But probably the most dangerous of his right-wing campaig...