Skip to main content

GETTING HONG KONG WRONG


John Clarke
August 13, 2019 


The key left argument against supporting the movement in Hong Kong is that it is a reactionary expression of nostalgia for colonialism that is funded and manipulated by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the CIA. 

Obviously, the view you take of the situation in Hong Kong will be significantly shaped by your view of China. I have to say that I can't really take seriously the position that a march towards socialism is being led by the Chinese Communist Party (with an adroit detour to foreign investment, stock exchanges and billionaires to create the economic basis for a classless society). However, even among those who think the Chinese working class must act independently and challenge the governing regime, there are still disagreements over the Hong Kong movement. 

The best commentary I've seen, some of it from local left sources and people from Hong Kong living abroad, doesn't try to pretend the movement there is without deep contradictions. Hong Kong was taken from China by the British imperialists and there was history of resistance, including and especially the upsurge in 1967. It was developed as a major financial centre and, while the British never allowed democratic elections, stability was maintained with concessions that granted some of the elements of liberal democracy. An independent judiciary, definite rights around free expression and assembly, etc.. 

When British rule ended, the 'one country two systems' arrangement preserved some of the distinct rights. Decades later, the role as a financial centre is in question and Beijing tires of the deal around two systems. Hong Kong elites have created a neoliberal Hell on earth, with inequality at world beating levels and housing costs at impossible levels. An arrogant and corrupt clique is in charge that Beijing supports. This unbearable situation brings forth social resistance and those who resist know that the limited freedoms that are particular to Hong Kong are viewed as inconvenient by the Chinese government and the local ruling clique. The spark was the Extradition Bill and some have smugly suggested this was not really very exceptional. However, the fear was that such a power would be used to remove those who were viewed as political troublemakers and this is why it was responded to as it was. 

There is no question that there is a very reactionary strain of localism in Hong Kong. At its worst, it can take the form of colonial nostalgia, pro-western sentiment and hostility to people from the mainland. I have no doubt that those elements have links to the State Department and that money has changed hands. I have also seen the Union Jacks and Stars and Stripes being carried on protests. However, those who tell me that protests are simply the work of the CIA are being ridiculous. The largest of the protests over the last couple of months involved some two million people. My partner is from Hong Kong and her sister sent us a message from that protest saying it had started out four hours ago and she was still waiting to start marching. If that's the work of the CIA, they have a remarkable skill set to be able to put half of the adult population on the streets. 

The left within the movement has pressed for a greater emphasis on political strike action and to reach out in solidarity to workers in mainland China. Beijing understands very well that, for all the confusion and contradictions, people in Hong Kong are resisting exploitation and inequality. China is a seething cauldron of discontent, with strikes and protests occurring on a huge ongoing scale. As the global downturn bites and Chinese growth levels diminish further, that resistance can become far more dangerous. A resisting Hong Kong can a catalyst in this situation. 

Put as succinctly as I can, these are my reasons for fully supporting the struggle in Hong Kong, warts and all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE PROFOUND EMPTINESS OF PIERE POILIEVRE by Bill lee

“You take the lies out of him, and he’ll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he’ll disappear.” - Mark Twain. There has never been any very substantial evidence that Pierre Poilievre is an even moderately well-rounded human being, or someone with even a modicum of depth. What he clearly is, is a career politician with no experience of, and no apparent interest in, life outside of the narrow, dark recesses of the CPC caucus room; i.e., he’s a pure political operator. Though that is something, let’s be honest, it is not a whole lot, at least if one wants to become an authentic political leader. At this point however he is becoming (has become?) a completely plastic image created by the gang of back-room boys whose task it is to construct something that looks like a leader. Whether what they have rendered in PP is, or even looks like, a leader however is questionable. Good leaders (never mind great ones) have an ability to, and interest in, showing an unders...
Post a Comment
Read more

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gun Violence and Bigotry, Due South & in Canada

Bill Lee August 24, 2019 Trump in his Florida speech asked how “these people” could be “stopped”. Someone among the crowd shouted, “Shoot them!” At first laughing, Trump responded, "That's only in the [Florida] panhandle, can you get away with that statement. [1] Given the obscene number of deaths from mass shootings in the USA recently it is probably not surprising that some of the old "rationales" have been taken off the shelf and dusted off. One GOP “legislator” has opined that there is a link to the spread and consumption of violent video games. Leaving aside that this is an exceedingly tired trope that has never been proven, there are a couple of others that clearly have much greater power as explanations. It is not, for example a fanciful notion that high capacity automatic weapons are a more likely link. [2] But there is another issue that really deserves much more full attention. When, oh when will the denizens political class, the media, a...
Post a Comment
Read more