Skip to main content

COLONIALISM THEN AND COLONIALISM NOW: the Attack on the Wet'suwet'en Land



Bill Lee
February 18, 2020



The recent attacks by the RCMP on the members of the land protectors of the Wet'suwet'en Nation in British Columbia in aid of the building of the Coastal Gaslink Pipeline have revived the discussion of the long history of colonial misappropriation of Indigenous resources and ill treatment of Indigenous people in Canada by the Canadian state. Of course the use of military and police force against Indigenous people was fundamental to the "clearing the plains"1 policy in the western expansion of Canada. It was a sordid story. We must be clear then that colonial outrages and thefts in Canada have a long and sordid history and that their effects have still not been adequately addressed (nor has there been serious recompense) by our society, except at the margins.


But it is just as important to be clear that Indigenous people continue to live under a social, economic and political regimen that is profoundly oppressive and profoundly colonial in nature and effect. The particular struggle being waged by the Wet'suwet'en land protectors and their allies today places the issue of Canadian colonialism in particularly stark relief. Here we have the convergence of the three elements mentioned above. First, the traditional land of an Indigenous people is being commandeered and despoiled, not for settlement as in the past, but in the interests of corporate profit. Second, the traditional land in and around which the social life of the Wet'suwet'en people has been, and is rooted, is being treated simply as simply another commodity by Canadian politicians and Canadian and International corporations. It is also being treated as a commodity in which the Wet'suwet'en have no claim despite having lived on it since time in memoriam. Further, as indicated above, it is being subjected to a development that will almost certainly bring great likelihood of pollution that will make it useless for living as well as traditional use. In this sense the Wet'suwet'en are being subjected to alienation from their own traditional land. Finally, the viability of the traditional political system of the Wet'suwet'en and their Traditional leaders, which have never been extinguished or relinquished by them, is being denied, treated as a non living, quaint artefact, or a system that in effect is non-existent. In effect, if it were not for the state sending in the RCMP as its colonial enforcer to evict them, we might believe that these people and their social, political and spiritual systems were invisible. This may be one of the most egregious aspects of Canada’s deplorable colonial treatment of Indigenous people at this period of history. There has been all sorts of pious blather about reconciliation2 but when the chips are down and really serious challenges are made against the colonial system, the protagonists are simply treated as individuals and not as "a people" in their own right who have an important collective claim on their land. Again, in effect, these Wet'suwet'en are being treated as if they do not exist. At least when the Imperial powers staggered ashore in North America, Indigenous people were recognized, treaties were made and signed. They weren’t usually fair and have been typically broken, but in making the treaties the Imperial colonialists did (unlike in Australia) not try to pretend that the land was empty. There was then a de facto recognition that the various Indigenous nations existed as a people with viable social, economic and political systems that were related to the land that they had lived on for centuries or more.


The aftermath with its broken treaties, residential schools, land encroachment and strategic starvation subverted and concealed that initial understanding and situation from view, at least from us Whitestream colonials, though not Indigenous people. The, long in coming, recognition and "apology" that the residential schools strategy was an attempt to destroy the various Indigenous communities and cultures appeared to signal a change in the government stance and there was talk of “reconciliation” that both government and Indigenous people were taking seriously. However, more recently the total emptiness of the notion of reconciliation without the Canadian state's prior rejection of the colonial relationship and dismantling of the colonial system of regulation and discipline of Indigenous people, has become apparent. Thus the notion and chatter of reconciliation is perhaps now gone, or it should be. But in the case of the treatment of the Wet'suwet'en it is clear that the notion of colonialism is very much alive, well and functioning. Any talk of reconciliation by Whitestream Canadians is being jettisoned, and interred in public. Along with this however, the most recent actions of the Canadian and BC governments ensure that decolonization is a dead issue for them. If this occurs - and the way the issue with the Wet'suwet'en people is resolved in some form of the usual colonial manner - we will have to face up to, and come to grips with, the stark reality that any hope that Canada can decolonize is being buried and along with that, our chances of becoming a just country will certainly perish.

________________________________________________________
1 This is a reference to the important book, Clearing the Plains: Disease, Politics of Starvation by James Daschuk (2014) 
2 I have written elsewhere concerning the lack of utility of the term reconciliation in this colonial country, THE CONTEMPRARY COLONIAL PROJECT IN CANADA. http://criticalperspectivesblog.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-contemprary-colonial-project-in_0.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

Bleak Times for Trump’s USA? by Bill Lee

“If we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration, there  may not be an election in 2028.” Gavin Newsom, Governor of California The news from the US of A about the wild and weird pronouncements and actions of the abhorrent individual sitting in the most powerful seat in the land, DJ Trump, is bleak. There is his destructive mania for imposing tariffs on every nation in the world: his corrupt attempt to block public knowledge of the truth of the sordid matter of the Epstein files; his racist hatred of Brown and Black people and his inhumane policy of arresting them willy nilly and illegally deporting many; his war on the hard won rights of women and other minorities; his ignoring of court orders (he owns a more or less corrupt Supreme Court); his impossible and unhinged comments on wanting Canada to become the 51st state of the USA; and his increasingly wacky and garbled speech, are only the most recent concerns. But probably the most dangerous of his right-wing campaig...

Party Status for the NDP? by Wayne Johnson

Permit me to pontificate on the issue of a minority government. It can be good, when MPs act in the best interests of the nation. The Cons have come right out of the gate claiming that they will derail any of PM Carneys plans. Folks I’m sorry, political preferences aside, our nation is facing some very serious challenges ahead. We are in point of fact at War, with the USA, an economic war. This economic war could very well escalate based on the threats of military annexation. And the Cons seem to want to derail government during a national and international crisis, not just economically but geopolitically, with the War in Ukraine and Trump’s lust for Panama and Greenland, for example. We also know who puts party above country… The Conservative party of Canada hands down… If I were advising Mr. Carney I would suggest that it is very much in the nation’s best interests to grant the NDP official party status. This is very much doable and has been granted in the past. The NDP has a long a...