Skip to main content

PERPETUATING THE COLONIAL LIE: The refusal of the Conservative Party to admit to the genocidal purpose of the Residential Schools in Canada


Bill Lee

December 30, 2020


A little while before Christmas, Erin O’Toole the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, had taken to peddling the old colonial lie that Residential Schools were created with some sort of benevolent intent. Press Progress (2020) reported that, at an event at Ryerson University in Toronto, O’Toole suggested that John A and his gang, and the governments that followed, simply wanted to make it possible for those little “savages” to be able to fit into the enlightened society of the properly “civilized” European interlopers.

Good Grief! This is disheartening, though perhaps less than surprising. This vile mendacity has been “accepted wisdom” in this country until very recently. Nevertheless, the absurd lie that good intentions were at the root of the residential school project (which lasted for generations) continues to be trotted out by various people. The idea of presenting the residential school project, one of the founding acts of this country, as anything but a shameful genocidal act on the part of the Canadian government, and therefore in the name of the Canadian people, is simply another colonial act. It is akin to gaslighting, attempting to deny the reality of facts and experiences of Indigenous people. The full history of these malign and destructive institutions clearly tells us that, no matter how much soft soap is lathered onto it, the story is, and was, first, last and always, one of colonial government attempting to rid itself, and Canada, of the first peoples of this land, Indigenous people and their cultures, in order to abrogate to itself the parceling out of land and resources to settlers and the corporations. There were three clear purposes that are well known, but just to be clear about how problematic O’Toole’s prattle is I will briefly note them below.


Killing the Indian in the Child

First, the very act of placing young children in these truly appallingly horrible institutions was an obvious act of genocide, the “killing” of Indigenous cultures in the children. This clearly resulted in their inability to relate in a healthy way to their communities. We have the words of MacDonald, “… Indian children should be withdrawn as much as possible from the parental influence, and the only way to do that would be to put them in central training industrial schools where they will acquire the habits and modes of thought of white men.” Duncan Campbell Scott, who enforced and expanded residential schools, refused to respond to a tuberculosis epidemic and oversaw a treaty process that “… robbed Indigenous peoples of land and rights. His oft-quoted goal to “get rid of the Indian problem” (Canadian encyclopedia, 2018) became the

defining focus of the federal government’s treatment of Indigenous peoples. The damage was intense and lethal.


Training, not Education, for Servitude

Second, the “curricula” of the system was not one aimed at “integration” of the little prisoners of these places into society in general. As Indigenous.Foundations.arts.ubc.ca suggest: “Residential schools provided Aboriginal students with an inferior education, often only up to grade five, that focused on training students for manual labour in agriculture, light industry such as woodworking, and domestic work such as laundry work and sewing.” In other words, the unfortunate inmates of these “schools” were taught to be workers for the colonial class. The idea of social mobility was not a part of the “goal” of these institutions.

Free Reign for the Worst in Human Behaviour

Third, the individual school authorities, usually but not always religious, were unregulated and unsupervised. “That was a sure recipe for abuse of the vilest kind. In addition to unhealthy conditions and corporal punishment, children were frequently assaulted, raped, or threatened by staff or other students.” (Indigenous.Foundations.arts.ubc.ca) There may very well have been some individuals here and there who thought they could do some good. But even these “good” experiences occurred within a system aimed at destroying Aboriginal cultures and assimilating Aboriginal students. (Indigenous.Foundations.arts.ubc.ca) The best that can be said of the people that were of good intent is that they were seriously mistaken. The fact that so few whistle blowers actually emerged should tell us something.

A day or two after his interview at Ryerson, and after a good deal of opprobrium had been heaped on him, O’Toole tried to walk back his offensive remarks. First though his Conservative spokesperson tried to suggest that the Cons were “better” in terms of Indigenous issues than the Liberals (Press Progress, 2020), which is simply an absurd obfuscation, and an amateur one at that. Any, ANY attempt to soften the image of the residential schools is vile, wrong-headed and continues to play into the hands, deliberately, of colonial racists like the loathsome and justly reviled Lynn Beyak (the still sitting Conservative Senator). In any event, there is no “walk back” or apology (actually, he has refused to apologize) that could possibly be credible in this case. It is one thing for the loony right-wing radicals to whine and lie, about how this country has treated first people, but it is quite another for a leader of a major political party to try to hornswoggle the public with malign codswallop. I have no idea how smart this leader of the Conservative Party of Canada is, but it is impossible to believe that he is unaware of; (1) the awful history of the Residential Schools and; (2) the awful history of the manner in which members of his party have spoken about Indigenous peoplei. O’Toole has shown his true colours, despite all his gibberish about being forward thinking and trying to get more Canadians to vote for the Cons. I hope that what O’Toole said, and tried to do, will not be forgotten over the Christmas-New Years period. Indeed, he was sending a message to the part of his base that are avowed colonial racists, namely he will continue to wink at the colonial lie.


_____________________________________________

Resources

Canadian Encyclopedia (2018). Duncan Campbell Scott. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/duncan-campbell-scott.

Indigenous.Foundations.arts.ubc.ca (Undated). The Residential School System. https://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/the_residential_school_system/.

Press Progress (2020). Erin O’Toole Claimed Residential School Architects Only Meant to ‘Provide Education’ to Indigenous Children. https://pressprogress.ca/erin-otoole-claimed-residential-school-architects-only-meant-to-provide-education-to-indigenous-children/?fbclid=IwAR1ukOGHz9SMN9X8jcD8pHgyp8GD4KEBfW0P6pMqOCubIpBOENHea9tP1Gw

Working Effectively with Indigenous Peoples®. (2016). 10 quotes John A. Macdonald made about First Nations. https://www.ictinc.ca/blog/10-quotes-john-a.-macdonald-made-about-first-nations.

i Recently the Conservative Premier of Manitoba, Brian Palliser, bleated about the unfairness to “Manitobans” of the possibility that Indigenous people in his province might receive a little preferential treatment with the Covid-19 vaccine. They were deemed, logically, to be at greater risk because of the poor living conditions they are forced to endure under Colonialism. Palliser obviously saw it as an affront to the Colonial Advantage of the Colonial class.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...