Skip to main content

VACCINATION IS NECESSARY, LET’S QUIT MESSING AROUND by Wayne Johnston

                                                  

It is truly amazing that we see so many part-time medical professionals on Facebook, and letters to the editor, particularly about the choice to get vaccinated or not. Of course, it is a personal choice. However, please don’t whine and complain about being discriminated against if you’re refused entry into another country, including the one of your birth. That is not discrimination on any country’s part, that is them being prudent and proactive. For those with a legitimate reason (like a medical one) I’m sure there will be some manner of accommodation. As for those who simply don’t wish to get it, get used to being restricted in your movement. 

What I truly find amusing or, more accurately, frustrating, is that those who won’t get vaccinated for medical/religious reasons etc., seem to be the loudest conspiracy theorists. The simple facts are, you and I haven’t the requisite knowledge in medical science. In other words, you don’t really know whereof you speak. Allow me to bring in a personal perspective. My English born wife, a retired oncology medical professional, was a key team member during SARS at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto. Princess Margaret is the top cancer care/research hospital in Canada, and most certainly is among the top ten world-wide. The hospital actually poached her from the UK due to her unique skill set in bone marrow transplants. Therefore, she knows what she is talking about. She is aware that cancer patients are at more risk than most, so SARS was given appropriate attention. What’s remarkable is that since March of last year my wife has been, unhappily, uncannily accurate in her predictions of the number of deaths which will come from the virus. Every time a state or province “opens up”, her predictions of the end result prove, again, unhappily true. Back in April of last year I asked her a question; If the Coronavirus had occurred in 1919, post WW1, what would have been the outcome. She replied with, “it’s hard to say 100 years later.”  Would the casualty count be much higher?  Absolutely... Would it be as high as the Influenza of 1919?  Very hard to say. She explained that the past century has seen light years of leaps in medical science and practice. 100 years ago, transplants of organs were unheard of and preventative vaccines were, at best, in their infancy.  The prevention, curing and management of so many, once fatal, diseases and injuries is so far ahead of what it was in 1919. Illnesses that were once common, like Polio, Measles, Mumps Scarlet Fever etc., are largely in the past. Of course, the research coming out of two world wars and countless conflicts have been some of the greatest contributors to the massive advancements. Many once fatal, or severely debilitating, injuries and diseases are being well managed. The list of medical advances is endless. Then there is the matter of sanitation and basic hygiene. We now understand the importance of the simple act of washing our hands and frequent bathing. We no longer live cheek by jowl in urban areas sharing ablutions and such. However, likely the greatest advancement is the internet and the amazing ability we now process, not just in the medical field but in everyday life to communicate important information. In 1919 we didn’t have instantaneous communication and the information highway we enjoy today. We know more and we know it faster. 

Let there be no mistake, this Coronavirus is real and without the precautions that have been taken would be far worse than it is. 

For all you amateur scientists and doctors out there, please include the medical and or scientific degrees you possess when you counter the logic and arguments made by medical experts. The pandemic is difficult on everyone and I surely recognize the economic hardships. That said, I will always believe medicine and science over some self-serving politician who may be in the pocket of big business. Notice Politicians are the ones allowing big-box stores/big business, etc. to remain open and thrive when, in fact, the public may very well be safer shopping at the smaller family-owned businesses. 

Here’s the deal for me... As a boy I was very lucky that my folks sent me off to Ireland for the summers.  I have many great memories. I also have one single stark, vivid recollection, a gravestone in Deans Grange Cemetery, Dublin. It was the gravestone of my great-aunt who was born in 1919, after my Grandfather fought in the Infantry from 1914-1918. He lived through the carnage of France and Belgium and then had the joy of having a baby, only to have the child taken away months later, by the horrible Influenza pandemic. She died the year she was born, 1919. She was the aunt I never met, a sister my mother and other aunt never knew, an innocent child lost to a brutal disease. All these years later I still remember her graveside and wonder what she would have been like. Fast forward, I am now a Grandfather to the sweetest prettiest little 1.5-year-old, Freyja. Because of the necessary precautions I’ve only actually seen her three times. I don’t want her to wonder what her Grandpa was like. So yes, I take this seriously. If we all just play by the rules suggested by the scientific and medical experts, I will get to see her soon. 

Think on this for a moment please. Given all the advances in science and medicine that continue as we speak, I think it’s fair to say that they have done pretty well for us thus far. My parents’ generation didn’t make a fuss when we were vaccinated for German Measles, Typhoid, etc. They sang the praises of Dr. Salk who developed the polio vaccine.  Imagine if we didn’t have those vaccines now. Who of us might have Polio or perhaps have been struck down by another childhood disease? For those on insulin, how would we cope had our Grandparents and Great Grandparents decided that Banting and Best were a pair of Canadian witch doctors, complete frauds?  All of a sudden, we don’t trust science and the medical profession?  In this case, the next time you are seriously ill, or stricken with a life altering ailment, might I suggest you consult your local reality-denying neighbour or politician or conspiracy theorist. Let’s be kind to one another here ok. I’ve presented what I believe to be a logical and sound rebuttal, that I hope you like and might use when speaking to a reasonable denier. The vast number are lost in an abyss far too deep too crawl out of in this lifetime.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE COVID PANDEMIC HAS CHANGED PANHANDLING by Jim Ward

Panhandling, i.e., begging for small change on the street, has been under considerable threat since the coming of Covid. Of course, the practice has been under threat before whenever the good burgers of some city find that the poor have resorted to “inconveniencing” the public and they feel the “moral” need to criminalize it. But Covid is causing different constraints. In these times very few people carry cash with them. In fact, many retailers will not accept cash, since it may well be ‘dirty money’. The term panhandling had its origins, so I’m told, during an economic depression in the United States in the late 19th century. That depression hit the panhandle area of northern Texas particularly hard and it caused many workers to head to New York City, where the ‘Buddy can you spare a dime?’ request was given birth. The practitioners of this art became known as the panhandlers. Back in the early 1970s I conducted studies of panhandling approaches in six North American cities, one of th...

THE PROFOUND EMPTINESS OF PIERE POILIEVRE by Bill lee

“You take the lies out of him, and he’ll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he’ll disappear.” - Mark Twain. There has never been any very substantial evidence that Pierre Poilievre is an even moderately well-rounded human being, or someone with even a modicum of depth. What he clearly is, is a career politician with no experience of, and no apparent interest in, life outside of the narrow, dark recesses of the CPC caucus room; i.e., he’s a pure political operator. Though that is something, let’s be honest, it is not a whole lot, at least if one wants to become an authentic political leader. At this point however he is becoming (has become?) a completely plastic image created by the gang of back-room boys whose task it is to construct something that looks like a leader. Whether what they have rendered in PP is, or even looks like, a leader however is questionable. Good leaders (never mind great ones) have an ability to, and interest in, showing an unders...

Gun Violence and Bigotry, Due South & in Canada

Bill Lee August 24, 2019 Trump in his Florida speech asked how “these people” could be “stopped”. Someone among the crowd shouted, “Shoot them!” At first laughing, Trump responded, "That's only in the [Florida] panhandle, can you get away with that statement. [1] Given the obscene number of deaths from mass shootings in the USA recently it is probably not surprising that some of the old "rationales" have been taken off the shelf and dusted off. One GOP “legislator” has opined that there is a link to the spread and consumption of violent video games. Leaving aside that this is an exceedingly tired trope that has never been proven, there are a couple of others that clearly have much greater power as explanations. It is not, for example a fanciful notion that high capacity automatic weapons are a more likely link. [2] But there is another issue that really deserves much more full attention. When, oh when will the denizens political class, the media, a...