Skip to main content

A CONCISE INTRODUCTION TO THE RAPTURE by Bill Lee

Recently I came across what I initially assumed to be a satirical take on the Rapture. That, for the uninitiated, is the belief, by some Christians, that one day in the foreseeable future a bunch of people will, at some point, be whooshed up bodily into heaven. I assume that these would be believers, who had lived lives of purity, go to church every Sunday, send in donations to various televangelists and believe that the bible is the ultimate in scientific truth. They doubtless don’t drink, smoke, swear, fornicate, believe in abortion and avoid non-believers unless in attempts to convert them. They would be the crème de la crème of the fundamentalist Christian set.


This particular post, on Facebook, was aimed at believers, who were being offered a pet care service should they be among the elect to be “raptured up” as the phrase is. It seems, at least in the illustration in the ad, that the elect would all be naked. I guess there is not much call for clothing in heaven but maybe it means that all the worthy will be nudists, or “naturalists” as most call themselves. Anyway, the ad seemed pretty funny. But apparently it is not, as in a quick search of the internet I found more than one site that offered such a service. The companies, they say, hire atheists and non-Christians to care for the menagerie at a small cost for registration. I guess since pets aren’t Christian or any other persuasion it is ok. Prices varied but I didn’t pay to much attention to differences. According to Pew, something like 40% of people in the US poled believed in The Rapture, firmly or partially (57% Protestant, 32% Catholic). That surprised me but given those numbers I thought I thought there might be in this Rapture idea and did a little checking. Here is the fruit of what I have learned and is offered here to lighten the darkness of those not familiar with this belief.

I have to admit that I’m not exactly an expert on The Rapture but I have read a few articles and do remember that there were more than a few believers among the GOP in the Bush Jr. era. John Ashcroft, his Attorney General, and several prominent senators and the House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay among them. There was a good deal written about it at that period, for example George Monbiot (2004) wrote a piece, and I seem to remember reading articles that explained that at some point a great swath of Christians, something like 2% of the US population, or at least the Christian population, I can’t remember which, would at some point find themselves flying up in the air. This would seem pretty disconcerting for them but since they would end up in heaven, I guessed they wouldn’t mind a few minutes of surprise and discomfort. But think of the people that were the witnesses of all these naked people being swirled heavenward. Surprise just wouldn’t nearly cover it.

Now for those of you who think that that is an awful lot of people to suddenly be gone from the earth, the story is that not all Christians get “raptured up” (if that’s the right term.) Apparently there are a whole whacking great number that get left behind. I don’t know the criteria the Deity is supposed to use in choosing who comes and who gets “left behind”, though that list of qualities I sited above is part of it I imagine, but I suspect it is all explained in a bunch of apparently quite popular novels, not surprisingly called the “Left Behind”1 series, that are all
about the whole rapture thing. It was, and maybe still is, popular reading material for some people who see it as authoritative (Monbiot, 2004).

So, someday there will be this sight of bunches of people floating upwards. But that’s not the end of the narrative. At some point after all the rapturing gets done, there is supposed to be an Armageddon where the Christians (including a bunch of Jews who have converted to Christianity for some reason) go to war with a whole whack of non-Christians. I gather that the bloodletting won’t happen immediately but not sure how long things will take to hot up. Anyway, the carnage will take place somewhere near Jerusalem. I’m not sure what the cause is supposed to be, perhaps a disagreement over some fine point in the bible or something. Christians will be led by Jesus, who will come back for the war, I think, and the non-believers by somebody called the Anti-Christ (I don’t know who he is). It is supposed to be a pretty blood and guts affair but apparently nukes will not be involved. You’d think they would be but you’d be wrong. (Spoiler alert, the good guys, aka Christians, win).

But we’re not finished yet. Then there is, I think, supposed to be a pretty long stretch of peace where everyone lives rather ok lives. I guess that would be because all the bad people, like socialists, communists, non-Christians and atheists, etc. would have been killed off during that Armageddon slaughter.

But nothing good lasts forever and eventually it will be time for “End Times”, at which point, I gather, Jesus comes, back one more time, and does all that judging that he is supposed to do. After all something has to happen to all those folks who didn’t get raptured. I think the bodies of people who didn’t get raptured, and who died, and there must be a whole whack of them, are supposed get out of their graves too. Just a guess but maybe their souls will get put back into their bodies, which are no longer decomposed. Don’t ask me how that is supposed to work. And I don’t know what happens to the people’s bodies that were cremated but that’s probably an irrelevant detail if you are a Rapture enthusiast.

After the judging, which must take a great deal of time, I’m not sure exactly what happens, maybe the good people go and have a celebratory lunch or something, maybe in heaven. I can’t be sure since I haven’t read any of the Left Behind books. And then, everyone exists forever, very happily ever after, except of course for the people who had been bad, you know the ones I mean. They, I assume, wouldn’t get lunch but just have to go straight to hell and live very unhappily ever after.

I think I have this more or less right but to tell the truth, I’m sure I may have left some things out, like maybe the whole Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse bit. And I’m not sure about anyone getting lunch, or dinner for that matter, it just seems like it would be a nice touch. I mean they’ve been hanging around during all that judging time. But you can always go and look at the “Left Behind” series to get all the genuine dope. Don’t bother with the Bible though, the end times and judgement stuff are there alright, but they forgot to include the Rapture.



Resources

Monbiot, G. (2004). “Their beliefs are bonkers, but they are at the heart of power”. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/apr/20/usa.uselections2004.
1 These things were written by a guy Tim LaHaye who was later joined by someone named Jerry B. Jenkins.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...