Skip to main content

REFLECTIONS ON TOXIC TRAITS by Cathy Tsong De Kwe

Toxic masculine and feminine traits are related back to the Patriarchal system1 in which those that possess them are reared. It is caused by the difficulty in this system of being able to develop the ability to nurture and be nurtured. This in turn results in a certain insufficient level of trust and/or feelings of safety.


Men over compensate their masculinity because they haven't been given the opportunity to be truly in touch with their emotions. Raised by emotionally unavailable or absentee fathers, they were not allowed to show emotion. And when they do release emotion, there is a tendency to use those emotions to manipulate, usually related as a survival mechanism. Emotionally unavailable mothers start their journey towards mixed feelings about other women in their lives because they attach, either through chasing someone else who is emotionally unavailable or not trusting when love is present. They also have a hard time accepting love because they feel they themselves are not worthy and therefore do not trust anyone who does love them. And so emotionally cut off from love, they go to men wanting to be healed but in an unhealed mindset, this translates to sex and then the men withdraw afterwards because this isn't what they really wanted after all. They just wanted to be nurtured.

Women were raised by emotionally unavailable or absentee fathers and thus started their quest to find fathers in their partners. If their fathers were angry or volatile, this instilled the need to fawn or detach emotionally. If their mothers were emotionally unavailable their attachment style was to chase and to find solace in her accolades.

Eventually when the accolades were too few and far between, the child can become dismissive and cut out people from their life. They will mirror their parents’ dismissive traits. Or, they may chase emotionally unavailable partners and continue that dynamic because they are unhealed from abandonment issues. The real issue is that chasing emotionally unavailable men instills in them the feeling that they themselves do not have to be emotionally available for anyone either. And vice versa, this also works for men as well chasing emotionally unavailable women. This can be experienced in a more in-depth manor if both of the involved people are emotionally unavailable.

Both men and women may have developed hyper-independence as a survival skill. They may feel that they cannot depend on anyone and will excel at self-sufficiency, not only for physical matters, but also for matters of the heart. This they will cling to as a sense of resiliency. Both will lack communication skills that, if worked on, could not only lead to the ability to set healthy boundaries but provide a safe environment for both to open up and feel safe enough to become vulnerable with each-other.

We would think that this kind of behavior might be synonymous with someone who has multiple partners or has gone through many relationships, but no. These behavioral traits can also come from people in long-term relationships and marriages. A person can go a lifetime in a long-term relationship with an unhealthy attachment style to their partner, and vice versa. What you do with this perspective is up to you. But just know that in this day and age.... every relationship status should always be up for examination. It's complicated.

Cathy Tsong De Kwe is ****(?)


Resource:

Lee, B. and Carranza M. (2021 Forthcoming). A Glossary of Social Justice Perspectives. Toronto: CommonAct Press. P. 22 1 Patriarchy is authority and control exercised by men over women, from Greek for “rule of the father.” Patriarchy can refer to control of women within institutions, and a culture’s ideology (as embedded in its language). Patriarchy is a classic example of hegemony operating and becoming embedded in social relations, institutions, norms and cultural arrangements (Bullock, 1977, in Lee and Carranza, 2021 Forthcoming)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ANY LEFT LEFT? OR WHY I AM DISAPPOINTED IN THE NDP

 By Bil Lee Prior to announcing that they would not support the Liberal budget (thus triggering an election over what was really a pretty left friendly Liberal program) the NDP in Ontario has been wasting a great deal of breath on hammering the Liberals over the "gas plant" scandal. Of course the Libs have been their old tricky and disingenuous selves in many ways and did waste a pile of money (and try to cover up how much) attempting to score some bi-election wins by cancelling the damn things. But the fact is the PC's and the NDP had both made a promise to cancel them if they got into power, so the money ws going to be wasted in any event. So it was all game playing, and pretty boring game playing actually. I am not against a solid critique of the Libs (except I continue to disagree on the utility of playing at the gas thing). My concern with role back of corporate tax breaks that Horvath has muted about as an election promise is that though I clearly support the ide...
4 comments
Read more

RITUALS KEEP CHANGING by Tony Boonstra

It is interesting that since time immemorial people have developed rituals. Sometimes we forget the initial meaning of the ritual. Take Christmas. It was originally “the Mass being celebrated at the time of Christ's birth”. That is literally what the word means. What I found helpful is an idea I came across in my studies at McGill University years ago. One professor shared with us the difference between a sign and a symbol. A sign is literally what it says. So, when one comes to a stop sign there is only one meaning. Stop. No rolling stops allowed. The meaning of a symbol on the other hand, is the meaning that a community embraces. This can change over time as the community's values and belief systems undergo changes. In the Netherlands they celebrate Sinter Klaas-Santa Claus, on December 5. The celebration takes on much of the meaning of what Christmas is in Canada. There is goodwill, exchanges of gifts, celebrations, etc. Then Christmas is a quiet day for reflection and for C...
1 comment
Read more

Lifeboats for the rich will sink us all – Income Inequality and Climate Change

 By: Mike Balkwill Climate change are words that form a constant hum in the background of my thoughts. It is an anxious hum and is the result of a lot of gathering a lot of information about climate change, its causes, its current and anticipated impacts on the ecosystem and therefore on human society. The hum goes like this – “Everything is going to change, everything has to change. Will the people I love survive?” In order for humanity, (and many other species) to survive the effects of the changing climate people who live in societies with capitalist economies are going to have to change everything about how we live.  One source I have read says that in the industrialized economies that means reducing everything we do that uses fossil fuels by 90%. This means anything that we do ten times in a day, or ten times in a week, or ten times in a month that requires fossil fuels we would now be able to do only once a day, one time in a week, or just once in a month. If I...
1 comment
Read more